Design & SimulationSeptember 12, 2024

Use Machine Learning to Optimize Weld Integrity

As a welded part cools down, residual stresses form within the part. The structural performance of a weld depends heavily on the parameters of the welding process, such as heat input, welding paths, and fixture designs. Simulation can model the weld process in order to calculate the residual stress distribution and deformation within welded submarine parts. This article explains how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning can be used to accelerate analysis and optimization of welds.
header
Avatar Stephen Jorgenson-Murray

With so many different parameters to vary, a full design space exploration using simulation might be prohibitively time-consuming. This means that engineers often have to resort to trial and error to find a welding process that produces parts of sufficient quality. Machine learning, using deep learning neural networks trained on simulation results, can significantly speed up weld optimization.

Two metal plates, perpendicular to each other in a T-shape. The welding path runs along their intersection.
The weld set-up used in this demonstration.

The image above shows an example of a simple weld optimization, using two plates of nickel-based superalloy IN625 measuring 200 × 100 × 5 mm. The welding simulation utilizes Abaqus software for sequentially coupled thermo-mechanical analysis, employing the Additive Manufacturing (AM) process simulation interface for flexible definition of welding paths, parameters, and heat flux distribution. A dataset of 80 simulations varying welding power (400-600 kW), speed (0.5-1.0 m/s), and torch angle (30-90 deg) is generated. 64 of these are used to train a neural network-based AI model, with the remaining 16 used to test it.

The trained neural network acts a surrogate model of the welding process. Once trained, it can calculate the 3D deformation and residual stress almost instantly for new parameters, representing a speed-up of over 100,000% compared to simulation alone. The model can generate many different types of result, including melt pool shape, temperature distribution, distortion and residual stress. The surrogate model shows excellent accuracy, with around 0.1% error in maximum deformation compared to the reference simulation.

Rainbow contour plots of temperature on a weld. The two plots show close agreement.
Temperature field and melt pool evolution test prediction from machine learning (left) and reference FEA simulation result (right)

The results from the surrogate model can also be used as an input for further simulations. The temperature distribution from a deep learning model for instance can be used for a thermal stress FEA simulation. In this way, machine learning and AI becomes a powerful tool for multi-scale, multi-physics analysis.

Conclusion

Using AI and machine learning to support simulation, engineers can not only analyze the integrity of thee weld, but optimize the properties of the weld quickly and efficiently. This allows engineers to improve the integrity of the joint and help ensure that safety and quality targets are met.


Interested in the latest in simulation? Looking for advice and best practices? Want to discuss simulation with fellow users and Dassault Systèmes experts? The SIMULIA Community is the place to find the latest resources for SIMULIA software and to collaborate with other users. The key that unlocks the door of innovative thinking and knowledge building, the SIMULIA Community provides you with the tools you need to expand your knowledge, whenever and wherever.

Stay up to date

Receive monthly updates on content you won’t want to miss

Subscribe

Register here to receive updates featuring our newest content.