[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":105},["ShallowReactive",2],{"S5k3zMAHQaDQInAk0czjxGr51-6ZZN_oKxpw06ekzaQ":3,"_apollo:default":103,"_apollo:identified":104},{"seo":4,"posts":15},{"social":5,"openGraph":11,"__typename":14},{"twitter":6,"__typename":10},{"cardType":7,"username":8,"__typename":9},"summary_large_image","dassault3ds","SEOSocialTwitter","SEOSocial",{"defaultImage":12,"__typename":13},null,"SEOOpenGraph","SEOConfig",{"nodes":16,"__typename":102},[17],{"id":18,"slug":19,"title":20,"uri":21,"excerpt":22,"locale":23,"featuredImage":26,"tableOfContents":34,"content":35,"date":36,"translations":37,"author":38,"tags":51,"globalTags":65,"brands":73,"keywords":84,"seo":90,"__typename":101},"cG9zdDozMDMxNDE=","transforming-electromagnetic-engineering-mission-ready-military-aircraft","Transforming Electromagnetic Engineering for Mission-Ready Military Aircraft","/brands/simulia/transforming-electromagnetic-engineering-mission-ready-military-aircraft","\u003Cp>Learn how virtual electromagnetic simulation connects installed performance, engineering decisions and mission readiness.\u003C/p>\n",{"locale":24,"__typename":25},"en_US","Locale",{"node":27,"__typename":33},{"large":28,"__typename":29,"medium_large":28,"thumbnail":30,"srcSet":31,"sizes":32},"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/image_93_50.png","MediaItem","https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/image_93_50-150x150.png","https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/image_93_50-300x153.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/image_93_50.png 383w","(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px","NodeWithFeaturedImageToMediaItemConnectionEdge",[],"\n\u003Cp>Modern military aircraft are becoming connected mission assets within wider air-combat architectures. They are part of a wider system of systems, where crewed aircraft, uncrewed collaborative platforms, sensors, weapons, electronic warfare functions and mission networks have to work together across air, land, sea, space and cyber domains. This changes the engineering task for defense programs. Radar, communications, navigation and electronic warfare systems cannot be treated as separate subsystems that are integrated late and then validated mainly through physical testing.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Electromagnetic (EM) performance is a system-level attribute: It affects detection, connectivity, survivability, spectrum advantage, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), resilience and mission readiness. It must be engineered, simulated and validated throughout the aircraft lifecycle. Advanced EM simulation capabilities, such as those provided by\u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia\"> SIMULIA\u003C/a> \u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite\">CST Studio Suite®\u003C/a>, enable teams to assess installed EM behavior earlier, including antenna placement, coupling, EMC risk, radar signature, electromagnetic environmental effects and electronic warfare resilience, before aircraft-level integration becomes the first serious test of the design.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>From a program perspective, the value goes beyond solving complex electromagnetic field problems. SIMULIA CST Studio Suite provides the physics-based evidence needed to understand installed EM behavior. On the \u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/3dexperience/\">\u003Cstrong>3D\u003C/strong>EXPERIENCE® platform\u003C/a>, this evidence can be connected to requirements, configuration data, validation intent and lifecycle decisions. In this way, virtual EM simulation becomes part of a broader\u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products/simulia/modsim\"> MODSIM\u003C/a> and digital-thread approach, rather than an isolated analysis.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"611\" height=\"270\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303168\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_1.png 611w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_1-300x133.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 611px) 100vw, 611px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig.1: Military aircraft electromagnetic environment.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>A military aircraft as shown in Fig. 1 contains and operates within a dense EM environment. Radar apertures, communication antennas, navigation receivers, tactical data links, electronic warfare systems, cable harnesses, avionics bays, radomes, conductive structures, composite materials and protection concepts all interact. At the same time, the aircraft is exposed to an external electromagnetic environment shaped by other platforms, emitters, communication networks, radar systems, electronic warfare activity and natural electromagnetic effects. The engineering risk is familiar: assumptions that look acceptable at component level can change once the system is installed on the aircraft and operates in its intended environment. The real question is not only whether an individual antenna, radar or subsystem meets its specification. It is whether the integrated aircraft can deliver the required mission functions under real operational conditions.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-from-installed-behavior-to-mission-ready-evidence\">\u003Cstrong>From Installed Behavior to Mission-ready Evidence\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM simulation becomes strategically valuable when it moves from analysis output to decision support. A field plot, antenna pattern, current distribution, coupling result or radar cross section (RCS) map can be useful. Its value depends on whether it helps answer a design, integration, qualification or mission-readiness question. Figure 2 summarizes this evidence chain.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"501\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_2-1024x501.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303213\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_2-1024x501.png 1024w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_2-300x147.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_2-768x376.png 768w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_2.png 1240w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 2: Evidence chain.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Traditional EM simulation remains essential. It can address complete-aircraft questions such as installed antenna performance, RCS analysis, coupling between antennas, onboard systems and the airframe, or EMC assessment. Model size is not the distinction. It is how the simulation is embedded in the engineering process that ultimately matters.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>In a typical, traditional workflow, an expert defines, runs and interprets a study as a standalone analysis. In virtual EM simulation, the EM model is connected to configuration data, requirements, validation intent and lifecycle traceability. If geometry, antenna placement, materials, cable routing or platform configuration change, the workflow can indicate which EM evidence has to be updated, rerun or reviewed.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>In that sense, virtual EM simulation is the EM-specific execution layer within a broader modeling and simulation (MODSIM) approach on the\u003Cstrong> 3D\u003C/strong>EXPERIENCE platform. SIMULIA CST Studio Suite provides solver-based EM insight, while the platform connects that evidence to system context, configuration data, validation planning and engineering governance. MODSIM provides the wider framework for linking modeling, simulation, system architecture, variants, verification and validation (V&V), and lifecycle decisions across disciplines.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-earlier-radar-rf-and-sensing-confidence\">\u003Cstrong>Earlier Radar, RF and Sensing Confidence\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Radar, radio frequency (RF) systems and sensing concepts need credible evidence early in development, before the aircraft configuration is frozen and design freedom is reduced. Their performance depends on aperture geometry, RF architecture, radome behavior, installation location, platform interaction and material properties when relevant. These factors influence technical uncertainty, detection confidence, sensor coverage and system performance.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>For this objective, the relevant workflow clusters are \u003Cstrong>Antenna & Integration\u003C/strong> and \u003Cstrong>RF, Radar & Materials\u003C/strong>. In practice, this means antenna design, installed-performance validation (as shown in Fig. 3), aperture behavior, radar performance assessment and RF architecture evaluation. Material behavior also matters when it affects RF transmission, radar performance or radome behavior; detailed signature optimization belongs mainly to the survivability objective.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"867\" height=\"670\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303214\" style=\"width:867px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_3.png 867w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_3-300x232.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_3-768x593.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 867px) 100vw, 867px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 3: Radome installation of a radar antenna.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM simulation allows teams to evaluate these dependencies while design options are still open. Engineers can quantify installed aperture behavior, coverage limitations, radome effects, platform interaction and material sensitivities before late prototypes or flight-test campaigns dominate the evidence base. For program leaders, this supports earlier down-selection and better trade-off decisions. For subject matter experts, it provides a technical basis for identifying critical sensitivities and building confidence in system performance.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-better-antenna-navigation-and-communication-integration\">\u003Cstrong>Better Antenna, Navigation and Communication Integration\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>A standalone antenna pattern may look acceptable, but aircraft integration changes the boundary conditions. Wings, tails, stores, radomes, apertures and structural edges introduce blockage, scattering and shadowing. Nearby antennas create coupling paths and co-site interference. In practice, installed antenna performance is what matters.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>This objective is driven by \u003Cstrong>Antenna & Integration\u003C/strong> and \u003Cstrong>Interference & Coexistence\u003C/strong> workflow clusters. These cover antenna design, radome design, antenna placement and installed-performance validation as shown in Fig. 4, together with co-site interference mitigation, multi-antenna coupling, electromagnetic compatibility and electromagnetic interference assessment.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\u003Cdiv class=\"ds-video\">\u003Ca data-3ds-videoplayer=\"modal\" href=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_4-ezgif-com-gif-to-mp4-converter.mp4\" target=\"_blank\">\u003Cspan class=\"ImageCover Border Block\" style=\"background-image: url(/assets/img/3ds-default.jpg); width:100%; height: 100%;\">\u003Cspan class=\"Btn--circle isCenter\">\u003Ci class=\"Icon Icon--playBig\">\u003C/i>\u003C/span>\u003Cimg decoding=\"async\" src=\"/assets/img/3ds-default.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:100%;\">\u003C/span>\u003C/a>\u003Cspan>\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 4: Animated surface current of an installed Link 16 antenna installation.\u003C/strong>\u003C/span>\u003C/div>\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM simulation turns these topics into integration evidence. Engineers can compare placement alternatives, evaluate installed far-field patterns, quantify coupling levels, identify blockage zones and assess coverage gaps before physical integration. The result is better coverage, stronger connectivity, fewer late installation surprises and more robust mission communications.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-more-predictable-platform-integration-and-emc-readiness\">\u003Cstrong>More Predictable Platform Integration and EMC Readiness\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Modern aircraft contain dense electronic architectures connected by power lines, signal lines and complex harnesses. Emissions and susceptibility must be managed across equipment, subsystem and platform levels, including both conducted and radiated paths. When EMC issues appear late, mitigation options are often limited, intrusive and costly.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>The key workflow clusters are \u003Cstrong>Electromagnetic Compatibility & Interference\u003C/strong> and \u003Cstrong>EMC of Mission-Critical Equipment & Subsystems\u003C/strong>. They link platform-level EMC and electromagnetic interference compliance analysis, electromagnetic vulnerability assessment (as shown in Fig. 5) and co-site coupling with equipment-level emissions and susceptibility evaluations.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"682\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_5-1024x682.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303216\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_5-1024x682.png 1024w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_5-300x200.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_5-768x511.png 768w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_5.png 1224w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 5: Near (NE) and far (FE) end cable cross talk.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM simulation helps identify coupling paths, emission mechanisms and susceptibility risks before qualification testing. Shielding, filtering, grounding, cable routing and equipment placement can be assessed while design freedom still exists. The program value is practical: less downstream rework, improved platform compatibility and a more predictable path toward EMC compliance.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-reduced-signature-and-improved-survivability\">\u003Cstrong>Reduced Signature and Improved Survivability\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM performance also includes detectability. RCS as shown in Fig. 6 is influenced by shaping, materials, edges, gaps, apertures, stores and installed systems. A small discontinuity can become a significant scattering contributor. Material choices can improve one signature aspect while affecting durability, thermal behavior, structural integration or maintainability.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"476\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_6-1024x476.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303217\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_6-1024x476.png 1024w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_6-300x140.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_6-768x357.png 768w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_6.png 1266w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 6: Radar cross section hotspots (left) and azimuth pattern (right).\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Here the primary workflow is \u003Cstrong>RF, Radar & Materials\u003C/strong>. It connects radar signature analysis and EM material design with geometry, aperture and installation effects that influence detectability. Simulation helps identify dominant signature contributors, evaluate material and geometry options, and understand how apertures or installed systems affect radar visibility.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>The aim is not to reduce RCS in isolation. It is to improve survivability while maintaining RF performance, integration feasibility, supportability and mission capability.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-improved-electromagnetic-environmental-protection-and-mission-resilience\">\u003Cstrong>Improved Electromagnetic Environmental Protection and Mission Resilience\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Electromagnetic environmental effects as shown in Fig. 7 add another layer of risk. Lightning, electromagnetic pulse, high-power microwave exposure, electrostatic discharge, radio-frequency electromagnetic environments and radiation hazards can affect avionics, sensors, communications and mission computers. Avoiding damage is only part of the requirement. The operational objective is to preserve mission capability under demanding electromagnetic conditions.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\u003Cdiv class=\"ds-video\">\u003Ca data-3ds-videoplayer=\"modal\" href=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/picture7-ezgif-com-gif-to-mp4-converter.mp4\" target=\"_blank\">\u003Cspan class=\"ImageCover Border Block\" style=\"background-image: url(/assets/img/3ds-default.jpg); width:100%; height: 100%;\">\u003Cspan class=\"Btn--circle isCenter\">\u003Ci class=\"Icon Icon--playBig\">\u003C/i>\u003C/span>\u003Cimg decoding=\"async\" src=\"/assets/img/3ds-default.jpg\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:100%;\">\u003C/span>\u003C/a>\u003Cspan>\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 7: Military aircraft exposed to a transient electromagnetic pulse.\u003C/strong>\u003C/span>\u003C/div>\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>The relevant workflow clusters are \u003Cstrong>High-Energy & Transient Effects\u003C/strong>, \u003Cstrong>Radiation, Hazards & Safety\u003C/strong> and \u003Cstrong>Protection & Hardening\u003C/strong>. They connect high-energy exposure, radiation hazards (for personnel, ordnance and fuel), lightning, precipitation static buildup, shielding effectiveness and hardening concepts to resilience decisions.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Simulation gives engineers early insight into exposure scenarios, induced currents, susceptibility margins and protection concepts. It moves hardening decisions upstream, before exposure testing becomes the first moment when vulnerabilities are fully visible. For critical systems, that can be the difference between late troubleshooting and deliberate resilience engineering.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-enhanced-electronic-warfare-and-advanced-em-capability\">\u003Cstrong>Enhanced Electronic Warfare and Advanced EM Capability\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Electronic warfare is often discussed in operational terms: threat detection, jamming, protection and signal resilience. From an engineering perspective, it is also an integration discipline. Electronic attack depends on installed antenna behavior, feed design and high-power source concepts as shown in Fig. 8. Electronic protection depends on filtering, shielding, adaptive antenna techniques and system robustness. Electronic warfare support depends on receiver front-end performance and wideband antenna behavior.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>The primary workflow cluster are \u003Cstrong>Electronic Attack\u003C/strong>, \u003Cstrong>Electronic Protection\u003C/strong> and \u003Cstrong>Electronic Warfare Support\u003C/strong>. They connect jamming-system design, adaptive protection measures, electromagnetic vulnerability and interference mitigation, hardening of critical electronics, wideband threat-detection antennas, receiver front-end evaluation and signal resilience to aircraft-level EW performance.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"362\" height=\"249\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_8.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303219\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_8.png 362w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_8-300x206.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 362px) 100vw, 362px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 8: Vircator electron dynamics.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>EM simulation helps assess these functions in aircraft context rather than as isolated subsystems. Electronic warfare performance is shaped by the aircraft, its installed antennas, its protection concepts and its mission environment, not just by the EW equipment itself.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-making-em-evidence-part-of-the-digital-thread\">\u003Cstrong>Making EM Evidence Part of the Digital Thread\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Military aircraft must continue to evolve over decades of service. Configurations change, mission systems are upgraded, new payloads are integrated and threat environments evolve. A one-off analysis may solve a specific issue, but it does not create long-term engineering continuity.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>This is where the earlier discussion becomes operational: model-based systems engineering (MBSE), MODSIM, Virtual Twin concepts, as illustrated in Fig. 9, and digital thread continuity make EM evidence reusable across variants, upgrades and validation decisions. In the Dassault Systèmes context, MODSIM refers to a unified modeling and simulation approach: simulation is connected with requirements, architecture, variants, validation and lifecycle decisions on the \u003Cstrong>3D\u003C/strong>EXPERIENCE platform.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\">\u003Cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"582\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_9-1024x582.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-303220\" srcset=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_9-1024x582.png 1024w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_9-300x170.png 300w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_9-768x436.png 768w, https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/military_aircraft_9.png 1028w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" />\u003Cfigcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">\u003Cstrong>Fig. 9: Military aircraft virtual twin.\u003C/strong>\u003C/figcaption>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products/catia\">CATIA\u003C/a> Magic provides systems-engineering context, while SIMULIA CST Studio Suite provides physics-based EM evidence. When these elements are linked, teams can compare variants, reuse and share evidence, trace assumptions and support readiness assessments throughout the aircraft lifecycle.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-from-transformed-em-engineering-to-mission-confidence\">\u003Cstrong>From Transformed EM Engineering to Mission Confidence\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Modern military aircraft are electromagnetic systems of systems. Radar, RF sensing, antennas, communications, navigation, EMC, electromagnetic environmental resilience, signature management and electronic warfare interact after installation. Treating these topics as separate late-stage validation tasks increases technical and program risk.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Earlier virtual EM simulation helps engineering teams understand installed behavior before physical testing becomes the only option. It supports better trade-offs, clearer mitigation paths and more focused validation. This is where the Dassault Systèmes approach adds value: EM behavior, system requirements, validation evidence and lifecycle continuity can be connected in one digital engineering workflow for mission-critical aircraft.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-continue-the-discussion-em-simulation-in-defense\">\u003Cstrong>Continue the Discussion: EM Simulation in Defense\u003C/strong>\u003C/h3>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>This article uses the military aircraft as an example to illustrate the electromagnetic complexity of modern defense platforms. To explore these topics in more detail, including how these EM challenges and validation needs extend across land, sea and space platforms, join the live webinar “\u003Cstrong>EM Simulation in Defense\u003C/strong>.” The session shows how \u003Cstrong>SIMULIA CST Studio Suite\u003C/strong> helps engineering teams accelerate validation, reduce program risk and improve integration across key defense EM objectives, from radar, RF and antenna integration to EMC readiness, survivability, electromagnetic environmental protection and electronic warfare capability.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>The webinar also covers how EM simulation fits into a broader defense engineering approach with MBSE, MODSIM, digital continuity and the\u003Cstrong> 3D\u003C/strong>EXPERIENCE platform.\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>Register here: \u003Ca href=\"https://events.3ds.com/em-simulation-defense\">https://events.3ds.com/em-simulation-defense\u003C/a>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cfigure class=\"wp-block-image\">\u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/communities/simulia-community/?_gl=1*flg7k7*_ga*MTE2NzE3NTU0OS4xNzAxODA4NTI0*_ga_DYJDKXYEZ4*MTcwMzA5Mjk1NS4xMS4xLjE3MDMwOTQ5NTEuMTQuMC4w#_ga=2.128142988.12672350.1703092955-1167175549.1701808524\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u003Cimg decoding=\"async\" src=\"https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2023/03/simulia-communities-email-signature.jpg\" alt=\"\"/>\u003C/a>\u003C/figure>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003C/p>\n\n\n\n\u003Cp>\u003Cem>Interested in the latest in simulation? Looking for advice and best practices? Want to discuss simulation with fellow users and Dassault Systèmes experts?\u003C/em> \u003Cem>The \u003C/em>\u003Ca href=\"https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/communities/learning-community/#_ga=2.186231657.1161542608.1587928634-d6a834f0-fe99-11e9-a0d7-7bef9ed67a15\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u003Cem>SIMULIA Community\u003C/em>\u003C/a>\u003Cem> is the place to find the latest resources for SIMULIA software and to collaborate with other users. The key that unlocks the door of innovative thinking and knowledge building, the SIMULIA Community provides you with the tools you need to expand your knowledge, whenever and wherever\u003C/em>.\u003C/p>\n","2026-06-11T17:29:22",[],{"node":39,"__typename":50},{"nicename":40,"description":41,"slug":40,"name":42,"firstName":43,"lastName":44,"avatar":45,"__typename":49},"marcokunze","Dr. Marco Kunze is a SIMULIA Industry Process Senior Specialist for Aerospace & Defense at Dassault Systèmes with more than 30 years of experience in applied electromagnetics, electromagnetic simulation, and high-frequency engineering. An IEEE Senior Member and former member of the Alcatel Technical Academy, he focuses on advancing electromagnetic simulation and making digital engineering more connected, practical, and impactful.","Marco Kunze","Marco","Kunze",{"default":46,"url":47,"__typename":48},"mm","https://blog-assets.3ds.com/uploads/2026/06/marco_kunze-89x96.png","Avatar","User","NodeWithAuthorToUserConnectionEdge",{"edges":52,"nodes":60,"__typename":64},[53],{"isPrimary":54,"node":55,"__typename":59},true,{"slug":56,"name":57,"__typename":58},"design-simulation","Design & Simulation","Taxonomy_topic","PostToTaxonomy_topicConnectionEdge",[61],{"id":62,"name":57,"uri":63,"__typename":58},"dGVybTo4NTU5","/topics/design-simulation/","PostToTaxonomy_topicConnection",{"nodes":66,"__typename":72},[67],{"id":68,"name":69,"uri":70,"__typename":71},"dGVybTo4Nzc0","Electromagnetics","/tags/electromagnetics/","Taxonomy_tag","PostToTaxonomy_tagConnection",{"edges":74,"nodes":81,"__typename":83},[75],{"isPrimary":54,"node":76,"__typename":80},{"slug":77,"name":78,"__typename":79},"simulia","SIMULIA","Taxonomy_brand","PostToTaxonomy_brandConnectionEdge",[82],{"name":78,"slug":77,"__typename":79},"PostToTaxonomy_brandConnection",{"nodes":85,"__typename":89},[86],{"name":87,"__typename":88},"CST Studio Suite","Taxonomy_keyword","PostToTaxonomy_keywordConnection",{"title":91,"metaDesc":92,"opengraphAuthor":93,"opengraphDescription":92,"opengraphTitle":20,"opengraphUrl":94,"opengraphSiteName":95,"opengraphPublishedTime":96,"opengraphModifiedTime":97,"twitterTitle":93,"twitterDescription":93,"readingTime":98,"metaRobotsNoindex":99,"__typename":100},"Transforming Electromagnetics for Mission-Ready Military Aircraft","Learn how virtual electromagnetic simulation connects installed performance, engineering decisions and mission readiness","","https://blog-frontoffice-contrib-prd.itvpc.3ds.com/brands/simulia/transforming-electromagnetic-engineering-mission-ready-military-aircraft/","Dassault Systèmes blog","2026-06-11T17:29:22+00:00","2026-06-11T19:23:05+00:00",11,"index","PostTypeSEO","Post","RootQueryToPostConnection",{},{},1781209509402]